<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Henrik Flensborg Internet Marketing&#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://henrikflensborg.com/tag/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://henrikflensborg.com</link>
	<description>Tips, Tricks, News and Reviews on stuff to help you become successful in your online internet business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Horrible Google ranking algorithm change</title>
		<link>http://henrikflensborg.com/129/horrible-google-ranking-algorithm-change</link>
		<comments>http://henrikflensborg.com/129/horrible-google-ranking-algorithm-change#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Flensborg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO & SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitelink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikflensborg.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A horrible change from Google just went live a few days ago. Up until now a site with a good pressence in the index had two ways to be extra visible in the SERPs. Sitelinks and the indented double listings. But now Google has introduced a change to their ranking algorithm where a single site <a href="http://henrikflensborg.com/129/horrible-google-ranking-algorithm-change"><b>...Read the Rest</b></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A horrible change from Google just went live a few days ago.</p>
<p>Up until now a site with a good pressence in the index had two ways to be extra visible in the SERPs.</p>
<p>Sitelinks and the indented double listings.</p>
<p>But now Google has introduced a change to their ranking algorithm where a single site could not only be featured with a bunch of Sitelinks, but it could also own multiple listings on the first SERP.</p>
<p>Take the search &#8220;technorati&#8221; for instance</p>
<p>Before the change the search &#8220;technorati&#8221; held a number 1 spot for technorati.com + 8 Sitelinks + a &#8220;More results from technorati.com&#8221; at the top of the page.</p>
<p>But now it&#8217;s quite a different picture.</p>
<p>On my laptop running 1280&#215;800 I could not see links to any other sites besides technorati.</p>
<p><a href="http://henrikflensborg.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/google-ranking-technorati.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-132" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" title="google-ranking-technorati" src="http://henrikflensborg.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/google-ranking-technorati-300x262.gif" alt="" width="300" height="262" /></a></p>
<p>So technorati.com holds #1 + 8 Sitelinks + a &#8220;More results from technorati.com&#8221; + listings #2 through #6 &#8211; 15 links in total.</p>
<p>Now, if you want to dominate Google&#8217;s first page then this change is great &#8211; but from a user perspective it&#8217;s utter useless clutter.</p>
<p>If I search for something and the #1 spot has 8 Sitelinks then I don&#8217;t need an additional 5 links to convince me to visit that site.</p>
<p>What I would really like to see is a few <strong>ALTERNATIVES </strong>to the #1 spot.</p>
<p>Before this change what you really wanted was the #1 spot because of the massively higher percentage of clicks it gets compared to the following 9 results. But in an effort to weigh effort against results you might have settled for a #2 or #3 spot and moved on to work on another keyphrase/page.</p>
<p>After this change there&#8217;s no such thing as &#8220;winning&#8221; 2nd or 3rd &#8211; if you&#8217;re up against an authority site then you&#8217;ll be &#8220;losing&#8221; everything and finishing last.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s even if your page was a better fit for the search term than the additional new listings for the authority site.</p>
<p>Personally I think this is a bad choice of change in the search algorithm and hope and expect that they will change it back really soon.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take on it?</p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://www.onlywire.com/button" title="Horrible Google ranking algorithm change" url="http://henrikflensborg.com/?p=129"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://henrikflensborg.com/129/horrible-google-ranking-algorithm-change/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our new search index: Caffeine</title>
		<link>http://henrikflensborg.com/115/our-new-search-index-caffeine</link>
		<comments>http://henrikflensborg.com/115/our-new-search-index-caffeine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Flensborg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO & SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loopholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web searches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikflensborg.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google just announced the completion of the long awaited Caffeine in Our new search index: Caffeine &#8220;Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index, and it&#8217;s the largest collection of web content we&#8217;ve offered&#8221; With an emphasis on freshness there&#8217;s a slight chance that the number of &#8220;tricks&#8221;, &#8220;secrets&#8221; or <a href="http://henrikflensborg.com/115/our-new-search-index-caffeine"><b>...Read the Rest</b></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google just announced the completion of the long awaited Caffeine in <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html">Our new search index: Caffeine</a></p>
<blockquote>
<div id="_mcePaste"><em>&#8220;Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index, and it&#8217;s the largest collection of web content we&#8217;ve offered&#8221;</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">With an emphasis on freshness there&#8217;s a slight chance that the number of &#8220;tricks&#8221;, &#8220;secrets&#8221; or &#8220;loopholes&#8221; revealed in &#8220;secret reports&#8221; and overhyped products will go down because there&#8217;s no need to do anything special to get indexed.</div>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://www.onlywire.com/button" title="Our new search index: Caffeine" url="http://henrikflensborg.com/?p=115"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://henrikflensborg.com/115/our-new-search-index-caffeine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack &amp; Abuse notifications from Google Webmasters Tools</title>
		<link>http://henrikflensborg.com/92/hack-abuse-notifications-from-google-webmasters-tools</link>
		<comments>http://henrikflensborg.com/92/hack-abuse-notifications-from-google-webmasters-tools#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Flensborg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webmasters Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikflensborg.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Central Blog just made a very interesting post about a new addition to the Webmasters Tools &#8211; a hack and abuse notification system Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice to be notified about the following three things? Spammy or abused user-generated content Abused forum pages or egregious amounts of comment spam Suspected hacking Well, if <a href="http://henrikflensborg.com/92/hack-abuse-notifications-from-google-webmasters-tools"><b>...Read the Rest</b></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Webmaster Central Blog just made a very interesting post about a new addition to the Webmasters Tools &#8211; a <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/is-your-site-hacked-new-message-center.html">hack and abuse notification</a> system</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice to be notified about the following three things?</p>
<ul>
<li>Spammy or abused user-generated content</li>
<li>Abused forum pages or egregious amounts of comment spam</li>
<li>Suspected hacking</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, if your sites are registered in Google Webmasters Tools then that&#8217;s exactly what you&#8217;ll be notified about (in Google&#8217;s own words) whenever they detects any of the following on your site.</p>
<p>Hacking, comment spam, spammy link profiles and probably other forms of spammy user-generated content on MU-sites and other blogging systems is a pain to have to deal with, so having Google looking out for you is a nice addition to whatever anti-hack and anti-spam system you have in place.</p>
<p>Most blogging software have some sort of anti-comment-spam, for instance Akismet or WP-Spamfree on WP platforms, and the same goes for forum platforms, but what about anti-hack features?</p>
<p>Except for keeping my passwords hard to brute-force crack and keeping WP relatively up-to-date I&#8217;m not really doing anything to prevent my site from being hacked, and this is where I think I will benefit the most from this new feature from Google.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I expect to be hacked, but it&#8217;s nice to know that if I should be targeted then I&#8217;ll receive a notification from Google.</p>
<script type="text/javascript" class="owbutton" src="http://www.onlywire.com/button" title="Hack & Abuse notifications from Google Webmasters Tools" url="http://henrikflensborg.com/?p=92"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://henrikflensborg.com/92/hack-abuse-notifications-from-google-webmasters-tools/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
